Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30567 (PNJ)

HARMINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/38600/2026 · 2026-07-17

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-38600-2026 #1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 115 CRM-M-38600-2026 Date of Decision:-17.07.2026 Harminder Kaur. ......Petitioner. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors. ......Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present:- Mr. Krishan Singh Dadwal, Advocate for the Petitioner. *** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at Bar that the petitioner will be contended at this stage, if a direction is issued to the respondent no.2 to dispose off the representation Annexure P-2 dated 08.05.2026 moved by her before the said respondent. 2. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 3. Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, he does not want to file response to the petition at this stage. 4. In view of the above but without commenting anything upon the merits of the contents of the representation Annexure P-2 dated 08.05.2026 and those of the claims raised by the petitioner in the present petition, it is VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.17 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-38600-2026 #2# disposed off with a direction to the respondent no.2 to dispose off the representation Annexure P-2 in accordance with law at the earliest possible but not later than 30 days from today. Anything mentioned in the present order shall not affect disposal of the said representation. 5. All interim applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI ) JUDGE 17.07.2026 Vinay Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No VINAY MAHAJAN 2026.07.17 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document