Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30565 (PNJ)

RAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

RA-CW/6/2023 · 2026-07-14

Nidhi Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 221 Raj Kumar State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J 1. application petitioner seeking modification/review of the order dated (Annexure RA 2. to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for review submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant review application to the appropriate remedy 3. 4. 14.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CW IN CWP Date of Decision: Raj Kumar .…Review Versus State of Haryana and others .... Non CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. RK Chauhan, Advocate for review Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The review-applicant/petitioner has filed application under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section petitioner seeking modification/review of the order dated Annexure RA-1) passed by the Predecessor Bench of this Court. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for review submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant review application, with liberty to the review-applicant/petitioner to the appropriate remedy, if any, in accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CW-6-2023 CWP-27043-2022 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Review-applicant/Petitioner Non-applicant/Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for review-applicant/petitioner. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. petitioner has filed the present review Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC by the petitioner seeking modification/review of the order dated 24.11.2022 1) passed by the Predecessor Bench of this Court. , when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for review-applicant/petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant review- applicant/petitioner to take recourse , if any, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No review CPC by the 24.11.2022 , when this Court is not inclined applicant/petitioner to take recourse RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.15 15:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.