27.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.627. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 1995 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ketugram Police Station case no. 67 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)338/336(3)/340(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Abu Sattar Sk @ Abu Sattar Sheikh @ Abusattar Sk @ Abu Chattar Sheikh & Ors. ……Petitioners. Mr. Uday Shankar Chattopadhyay Ms. Trisha Rakshit Ms. Aishwarya Datta .....for the Petitioners. Mr. Bankim Pal ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case after the change of administration. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and has pointed out from the Case Diary that fake order of posting was handed over to the de-facto complainant. The genesis of the case relate to a sum of Rs.29/- lakhs being handed over for providing job. Learned advocate has also drawn the attention of the Court to the bank statement. I have taken into account the overall circumstances including the complicity of each of the accused persons. Having regard to the overall circumstances, I am of the opinion that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner no.1 namely, Abu 2 Sattar Sk @ Abu Sattar Sheikh @ Abusattar Sk @ Abu Chattar Sheikh and petitioner no.2 namely, Sakila Bibi @ Shakila Bibi should be rejected. So far as the petitioner nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 being Sadikul Sk @ Sadikur Sk, Abubakkar Sk @ Bakkar Sk, Saharuk Sk and Mahibul Sk @ Santosh Sk are concerned, their prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall furnish bonds subject to the satisfaction of the investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As, the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioners nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 shall make themselves available before the investigating officer within a period of 10 days from date thereafter make themselves available as and when called for by the investigating officer of the case. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 1995 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)