Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2026:CGHC:12386 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2443 of 2026 1 - Krishna Lal Nishad S/o Madan Sai Aged About 41 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Tribal Boys Hostel Baramkela, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Sushil Kumar Bareth S/o Shri Mohan Bareth Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Tribal Boys Hostel Birnipali Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Ghanshyam Chauhan S/o Lekaru Chauhan Aged About 37 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Tribal Boys Hostel Baramkela, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Rajesh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Teklal Aged About 36 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Schedule Caste Boys Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Sudama Patel S/o Shri Vishram Patel Aged About 37 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Scheduled Caste Boys Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Vinod Kumar Chouhan S/o Shri Hemant Chouhan Aged About 36 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Scheduled Caste Boys Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 7 - Subhasini Chouhan D/o Bhagau Chouhan Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Scheduled Caste Girls Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 8 - Jayram Chouhan S/o Kriparam Chouhan Aged About 38 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Boys Ashram Sankra, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 9 - Chandan Pradhan S/o Uddhav Pradhan Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Boys Ashram Sankra, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 10 - Mahendra Das Mahant S/o Shiv Prasad Mahant Aged About 36 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Tribal Boys Ashram Dhouradarha, Block Baramkela District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 11 - Ajay Kumar Chouhan S/o Shri Vidhyadhar Chouhan Aged About 45 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Tribal Boys Ashram Kenabhantha, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 12 - Sunil Pradhan S/o Shri Uttam Pradhan Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Schedule Caste Boys Hostel Sariya, Block Sariya, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 13 - Sitaram Yadav S/o Shri Munuram Yadav Aged About 33 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Schedule Tribes Boys Ashram Kenabhantha, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 14 - Hemant Sidar S/o Shri Nanki Dau Sidar Aged About 35 Years
Working As Peon And Posted At Boys Hostel Gobarsinha, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 15 - Anusuiya Rupa D/o Shri Lalit Rupa Aged About 36 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Schedule Tribes Girls Hostel Baramkela, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 16 - Hem Bai Ratre W/o Shri Vijay Shankar Ratre Aged About 43 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Schedule Caste Girls Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 17 - Dhaneshwari Mehar W/o Parasram Mehar Aged About 35 Years Working As Peon And Posted At Pre-Metric Schedule Caste Girls Hostel Bonda, Block Baramkela, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioners Versus
3 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Department Of Tribal Welfare University Campus, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - District Collector Sarangarh- Bilaigarh, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare Department, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.)
... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Chandrasen Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER ON BOARD 16/03
/2026
1. Petitioners has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider pending representation and grant arrears of revised pay scale pay scale during from year 2016 to 2021 with 18% interest as directed by the Hon’ble Division Bench as well as Hon’ble Single Bench within stipulated time, in the interest of justice.. 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the
facts and circumstances of the case including cost of the petition, may also be granted.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners were appointed as Workcharged Contingency Paid Class IV Employees vide appointment order dated 24.07.2013 (Annexure P/2). He submits that pursuant to the order passed by High Court in WA. No. 481/2015 (Prakash Dansena & Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) dated 03.10.2018, the respondent authorities have granted time bound pay scale to the similarly situated employees vide order dated 20.09.2021 w.e.f. 2016. Though the petitioners are getting salary in view of the order
4 dated 20.09.2021, however, the petitioners are also entitled to get the arrears of pay from the 2016 to 2022. Petitioners have submitted representations raising their grievance for payment of arrears of time bound pay scale before the respondent authorities, however, the same is pending consideration and therefore, direction be issued to the Respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the representations submitted by the petitioners.
3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the Respondents/State would submit that as petitioners are not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to the Respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the representations submitted by the petitioners, she is having no objection to the limited prayer.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record.
5. On due consideration of the submission of counsel for the respective parties, facts and circumstances of the case, nature of grievance raised by the petitioner, without entering into the merits of the claim of petitioners, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing the Respondent No. 4 to consider and take decision on the representations dated 10.11.2025 and 23.01.2026 (Annexure P/1) submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of representation.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands
disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY