Page No. 1/4 GAHC010039202026 2026:GAU-AS:3391 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1254/2026 GUL BHANU NESSA WO NUR ISLAM SHEIKH, D/O-LATE ABDUL GONI, R/O-VILL BAMUNPARA, P/S-MATIA, DIST-GOALPARA, ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-01 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME GOVT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI 06 3:THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1 4:THE ELECTION OFFICER GOALPARA PO AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 783101 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA PO AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 783101 6:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (BORDER) Page No. 2/4 GOALPARA PO AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 78310 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S I TALUKDAR, J A SIKDAR,MR. Z H BORA,MR. A R SIKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM,SC, ECI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 06.03.2026 Heard Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. G. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, Home and FT for the respondent nos. 1 & 6; Mr. A.I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, Election Commission of India [ECI] for the respondent nos. 3 & 4; and Mr. G. Bokolial, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 5. 2. The petitioner has stated that she was born in the year 1971 and after solemnisation of her marriage with Noor Islam Sheikh in the year 1986, she started residing at Village – Bamunpara, Police Station – Matia, District – Goalpara under 15 No. Dudhnoi LAC. 3. Mr. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier, the petitioner was put to notice in connection with a proceeding drawn up as F.T. Case no. F.T.[5] 276/MA/16 [IMDT Reference Case no. 948/2004] before the Foreigners’ Tribunal No. 5th at Goalpara and the Foreigners’ Tribunal rendered an Opinion on 23.09.2019 releasing the petitioner from the proceeding. 4. Mr. Ali, learned Standing Counsel, ECI has submitted that from the Opinion dated 23.09.2019 of the Foreigners’ Tribunal No. 5th at Goalpara in F.T. Case no. F.T.[5] 276/MA/16, it is evident that the petitioner was released from the proceedings not on the ground that the petitioner was declared as an Indian citizen. He has further submitted that the proceedings of Page No. 3/4 F.T. Case no. F.T.[5] 276/MA/16 was drawn up against one Gulbhanu Nessa, daughter of Late Usman Goni. As the father of the petitioner was Late Abdul Goni and not Late Usman Goni, the petitioner was released from the said proceedings. 5. Mr. Ali has submitted, on instruction, that the petitioner has been marked as ‘D’ Voter in the Voters List of 2017 as well as in the subsequent years including the Voters List of 2025. 6. The petitioner is aggrieved because of the tag ‘D’ mentioned against her name in the Voters List of 2017 onwards and also in the Voters List of 2025 in respect of 15 No. Dudhnoi LAC, as a resident of Village – Bamunpara, Police Station – Matia, District – Goalpara as repeated approaches to the respondent authorities did not bring out the desired result of removal of ‘D’ mark. 7. With a projection that the respondent authorities had failed to do the needful, the petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for an appropriate direction that the ‘D’ Voter tagged with the name of the petitioner in the Voters List be removed. 8. Whether a person is a ‘D’ Voter or not is a matter of factual determination and the appropriate forum to do the same is the concerned Foreigners Tribunal. This Court in exercise of its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not embark on a fact- finding exercise to decide such a question which depends on the evidence that may be produced. 9. In the circumstances, this Court therefore directs the respondent no. 6 i.e. the Superintendent of Police [Border], Goalpara to verify as to whether the petitioner has already been referred to the concerned Foreigners Tribunal and if upon verification it is found that the petitioner has not been referred to the concerned Foreigners Tribunal, this Court further directs the respondent no. 6 to refer the case of the petitioner as regards the mark ‘D’ in the Voters List in respect to 15 No. Dudhnoi LAC to a competent Foreigners Tribunal, Goalpara district for an appropriate adjudication as regards the status of the petitioner as ‘D’ Voter in Page No. 4/4 the concerned Voters List. 10. Reference be made within a period of 2 [two] months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Upon such reference being made, the petitioner may participate in such proceedings and establish her case. 11. If the case of the petitioner as per the records had already been referred to the relevant Foreigners Tribunal, there would be no requirement to make any further reference and the detailed information of the earlier reference be communicated to the petitioner. 12. With the above directions and observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant