Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30535 (CAL)

MADHUMITA ROY @ MADHUMITA GHOSH ROY @ PINKI v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2090/2026 · 2026-07-27

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.633. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (A) 2090 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Naihati Police Station case no. 182 of 2026 dated 16.06.2026 under Sections 109/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/126(2)/189(2)/190/191(3)/3(5)/351(3)/7 4/79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Madhumita Roy @ Madhumita Ghosh Roy @ Pinki. ……Petitioner. Mr. Anit Dey Mr. Ankur Santra .....for the Petitioner. Ms. Priyanka Chandra ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the incident complained of on 08.05.2025 and the information to the police authorities was furnished on or about 15.06.2026. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. The injury report has also been produced. I have taken into account the overall factual circumstances of the present case and is of the opinion that custodial detention of the petitioner may not be warranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Madhumita Roy @ Madhumita Ghosh Roy @ Pinki is allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall furnish bond subject to the satisfaction of the 2 investigating officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Petitioner is a lady, as such she must make her availability known to the investigating officer of the case within a period of 10 days from date, the investigating officer will inform and visit the petitioner as and when required for the purposes of the investigation of the case. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2090 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)