TA No. TA No. TA No. TA No.284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 204 POOJA POOJA POOJA POOJA Vs Vs Vs Vs DEVENDER DEVENDER DEVENDER DEVENDER CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Present: Mr. for the applicant. Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for the respondent. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. [1]. [1]. [1]. The case bearing DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 under Section 9 husband; from the Court of learned Rewari to the Court of [2] [2] [2] [2].... Briefly stating, the marriage between the was solemnized on Vedanshu Rao, was born on between the parties, the instance of respondent transfer thereof came to be filed by the [3]. Learned counsel for the applicant-wife is working as full time Nursing Officer in PGIMER, Chandigarh 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH Transfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Aman Dhir, Advocate for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) The applicant-wife, by way of present DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 DMC/956/2025 dated 09.12.2025, titled 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 at the husband; from the Court of learned Additional Rewari to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Briefly stating, the marriage between the was solemnized on 19.04.2018; out of their wedlock, a , was born on 18.07.2020; on account of matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned petition came to be instance of respondent-husband. Thereupon, the present came to be filed by the applicant Learned counsel for the applicant is working as full time Nursing Officer in PGIMER, Chandigarh IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No.284 284 284 284 of 202 of 202 of 202 of 2026666 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: 09 09 09 09.07.2026 .07.2026 .07.2026 .07.2026 ...... ...... ...... ......Applicant Applicant Applicant Applicant …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA MANUJA MANUJA MANUJA wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of , titled “Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja””””, filed Marriage Act, 1955 at the instance of respondent Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, competent jurisdiction at Chandigarh. Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent ; out of their wedlock, a male child namely, ; on account of matrimonial discord above mentioned petition came to be preferred at the , the present application seeking applicant-wife. applicant, inter alia, contends that the is working as full time Nursing Officer in PGIMER, Chandigarh 1 transfer of , filed instance of respondent- Family Court, respondent namely, ; on account of matrimonial discord preferred at the application seeking , contends that the is working as full time Nursing Officer in PGIMER, Chandigarh MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment TA No. TA No. TA No. TA No.284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 and is residing at Chandigarh with her son, who is also studying in school at Chandigarh. Accordingly, a prayer is made for petition filed at the Additional Principal Judge, jurisdiction at Chandigarh. [4]. [4]. [4]. [4]. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent the prayer made on b [[[[5555].].].]. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book. [[[[6666].].].]. As per averments in Chandigarh. The minor son is residing with the applicant and Chandigarh. The applicant Rewari as there is a distance of and Rewari. [[[[7777].].].]. Further, reliance can be placed upon the judgments passed in the case(s) of Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has obse application, the Courts are required to give more the convenience of the female Court to another convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female undue hardships. 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 and is residing at Chandigarh with her son, who is also studying in school at Accordingly, a prayer is made for petition filed at the instance of respondent-husband Principal Judge, Family Court, Rewari to the Court of jurisdiction at Chandigarh. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent the prayer made on behalf of the applicant. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the As per averments made in the application, both the parties are residing . The minor son is residing with the applicant and he applicant is facing great difficulty as there is a distance of approximately 325 Further, reliance can be placed upon the judgments passed in the Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay Sumita Singh vs. Kumar Sanjay reported as Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardesh Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardeshiiii reported as wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that while application, the Courts are required to give more the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female undue hardships. and is residing at Chandigarh with her son, who is also studying in school at Accordingly, a prayer is made for transfer of the above mentioned husband from the Court of learned Family Court, Rewari to the Court of competent On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent has not opposed I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the made in the application, both the parties are residing . The minor son is residing with the applicant and studying in great difficulty in pursuing the said case 325 Kilometers between Chandigarh Further, reliance can be placed upon the judgments passed in the reported as “2002 SC 396 “2002 SC 396 “2002 SC 396 “2002 SC 396” and Rajani Rajani Rajani Rajani reported as “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237” rved that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under 2 and is residing at Chandigarh with her son, who is also studying in school at transfer of the above mentioned from the Court of learned competent opposed I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the made in the application, both the parties are residing studying in the said case at Chandigarh Further, reliance can be placed upon the judgments passed in the Rajani Rajani Rajani Rajani “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237” “2005(12) SCC 237”, deciding the transfer weightage and consideration to litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one into consideration their tigants under MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment TA No. TA No. TA No. TA No.284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 [8]. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances consent of the parties as both the applicant and respondent are work Chandigarh and both the parties that their case transfer shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the individual allegations Consequently the transfer application is the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. the respondent-husband, stands transferred Principal Judge, Chandigarh. The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Rewari [9]. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. July July July July 09 09 09 09, , , , 20 20 20 2026 26 26 26 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 284 of 2026 onsidering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the parties as both the applicant and respondent are work Chandigarh and, in the humble opinion of this Court, it would be in the interest of the parties that their case be heard at Chandigarh. transfer shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the allegations levelled in the present case against the respondent. Consequently the transfer application is allowed allowed allowed allowed the Hindu Marriage Act i.e. DMC/ DMC/ DMC/ DMC/956 956 956 956////2025 2025 2025 2025, titled husband, stands transferred from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Rewari to the Court of The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Rewari to the Court concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No onsidering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and with the of the parties as both the applicant and respondent are working in , in the humble opinion of this Court, it would be in the interest of at Chandigarh. However, the order of transfer shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the in the present case against the respondent. allowed allowed allowed allowed and the petition under Section 9 , titled ““““Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja Devender Vs. Pooja””””, filed by from the Court of learned Additional Family Court, Rewari to the Court of competent jurisdiction at The requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the learned Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 3 ith the ing in , in the humble opinion of this Court, it would be in the interest of However, the order of transfer shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the in the present case against the respondent. 9 of , filed by Additional competent jurisdiction at learned Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.14 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment