K.Ilayaraja v. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai
WP Crl.(MD)/2947/2026 · 2026-06-05
L Victoria Gowri
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30509 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30509 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.06.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026 K.Ilayaraja ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District.
3. Pandiyammal
... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to issue necessary direction to the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action as against the 3rd respondent herein on the basis of the representation dt. 31.05.2026 submitted to the respondents No.1 & 2 through online. For Petitioner : Mr.VM.Kannan For Respondents : Mr.P.Vetrivel (R1 & R2) Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026
ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to issue necessary direction to the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action as against the 3rd respondent herein on the basis of the representation dated 31.05.2026 submitted to the respondents No.1 & 2 through online.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has lodged a complaint as against the third respondent. However, no action was taken by the police. Aggrieved by the same, the present petition has been filed.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that an enquiry is pending.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the third respondent, notice to her is dispensed with.
5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 31.05.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026 parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 05.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:-
1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai, Madurai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Madurai District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm
Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.2947 of 2026 Dated 05.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis