Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010179252024
2026:CGHC:33527
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2751 of 2024 1 - Yogesh Singh S/o Nandu Singh Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Sandi Tahsil Khairagarh District Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai (C.G.) Occupation Samiti Manager Sewa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Aamdani, District- Khairagarh Chhuikhdan Gandai, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai District Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Marketing Federation Limited 6th Floor Tower-C, Commercial Complex Cbd Sector 21 Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai District Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh. 5 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Branch Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai District Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For State/ Respondent : Mr. Anmol Sharma, P.L. For Respondents No.3 and 5 : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Advodate For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Digitally signed by ARPAN SRIVASTAVA Date: 2026.08.03 19:18:30 +0530
2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03.08.2026
1. During the course of hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause of action no longer survives, and in view of subsequent developments, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the same and has no objection to the petition being dismissed as infructuous.
3. In view of the above, and since nothing further survives for adjudication, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Arpan