Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3050 (UTT)

KAVITA DEVI v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WPMS/723/2026 · 2026-03-25

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2127 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.723 of 2026 Kavita Devi --Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank and Others --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. R.V.S. Khokher, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. Siddharth Jain, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3/Bank. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner made a statement at Bar that he wants to withdraw the present writ petition on the instruction of his client, as certain talks of settlement is going on between petitioner and respondent-Bank. 4. The permission, so made, is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh as and when cause of action would arise. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.03.2026 PN