Abhinash Singh @ Avinash Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./2406/2026 · 2026-01-28
Anil Kumar Sinha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30497 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30497 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2406 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2020 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Abhinash Singh @ Avinash Kumar Singh Son of Ful Singh Resident of village-Harinaha, PS-Jadia Dist- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Jadiya Police Station Case No. 204 of 2020, dated 25.10.2020, disclosing offences punishable under Sections 341/323/307/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 31.10.2020, the son of the informant was fishing from the pond, in the meanwhile, the petitioner along with other accused persons armed with lathi, danda etc. arrived there and started assaulting him. It has been alleged that the petitioner and co-accused Sintu Singh assaulted by means of lathi due to which the informant’s son sustained injury on his head. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2406 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this false case due to village politics. He further submits that occurrence has taken place on 25.10.2020 but the FIR has been lodged after much delay of six days i.e. on 31.10.2020. The allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature and there is specific allegation of assault in the FIR is against co- accused Sintu Singh. He further submits that anticipatory bail application of co-accused Sintu Singh has been rejected by the coordinate Bench of this in Cr. Misc. 61198 of 2025. However, co-accused Ravindra Singh @ Damdam Singh having similar allegation as that of the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court in the aforesaid Cr. Misc. application. 5.
Regards being had to the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the genesis of occurrence and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and similarly situated co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, I am inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of anticipatory bail. 6. This application is, accordingly, allowed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2406 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Jadiya Police Station Case No. 204 of 2020, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. khushbu/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U T