Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30486 (CHH)

AMARNATH YADU v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT

WPS/4275/2021 · 2026-07-30

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010199252021 2026:CGHC:33099 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4275 of 2021 1 - Amarnath Yadu S/o Rudranath Yadav Aged About 35 Years Peon, Family Court, Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Judge Family Court Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - High Court Of Chhattisgarh Through Registrar General, High Court, Bodri, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Principal Secretary Department Of Law, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shatruhan Kumar Tonde Process Server, Family Court, Janjgir, District- Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.K. Jha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Kumbhare, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 2 Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. Mr. Bhaskar Pyasi, learned counsel appearing for Respondents No.1 and 2 fairly submit that during the pendency of this petition, the VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.08.03 12:09:10 +0530 2 petitioner has already been promoted to the post of Professor vide order dated 22.02.2024. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the competent authority claiming seniority and other consequential benefits from the date when his juniors were promoted on the said post. 3. No objection raised by the other side. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Vaishali