Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3048 (UTT)

MEERA KACKER v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/275/2026 · 2026-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1989 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.275 of 2016 Meera Kacker --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Ors. --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel with Ms. Swati Verma, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 and 2. 3. After arguing vehemently a long, learned counsel for petitioner wants to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order in the appropriate remedy under law is provided. 4. Permission, so made, is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2026 PN