Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3048 (HP)

VIJAY SINGH v. THE UOI AND OTHERS

CWP/3933/2025 · 2026-04-16

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:11610 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 3933 of 2025 Decided on: 16.04.2026 Vijay Singh …….Petitioner Versus Union of India and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr Balram Sharma, DSGI for respondent-UOI. Mr. R.P. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for respondents-State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed letter dated 14.03.2025 (Annexure P-6), in terms whereof the petitioner has been disembodied from the Territorial Army. A preliminary objection has been taken with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition by learned Deputy Solicitor General of India who asserts that the petitioner has to invoke the jurisdiction of learned Armed Forces Tribunal. Faced with this situation, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition before the learned 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:11610 Armed Forces Tribunal on the causes agitated in the present petition as well as subsequent causes, based on which miscellaneous application(s) stand filed under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The time spent by the petitioner while pursuing this petition may be taken into consideration by learned Armed Forces Tribunal while calculating the limitation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 16, 2026 (narender)