IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13343 of 2018 ====================================================== Ganesh Kumar Alias Ganesh Kumar Sinha Son of Sri Nathun Singh, Resident of Vill- Chulhai Chak, P.S.- Rupaspur, Dist- Patna, Pin- 801506, Mobile No.- 9304013417. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union Of India through the General Manager, East Central Railways, Ministry of Railway, Hajipur 2. The Divisional Railway Manager D.R.M. East Central Railway, Ministry of Railway, Danapur. 3. The Chief Engineer, Construction, Ganga Bridge East Central Railways, Digha Ghat, Patna. 4. The Deputy Chief Engineer, Construction, Ganga Bridge East Central Railway, Digha Ghat, Patna. 5. The State of Bihar through the Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Gov 6. The Collector, Patna. 7. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. 8. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 10-02-2026 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders in the nature of mandamus for directing commanding the Patna High Court CWJC No.13343 of 2018(5) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 Respondents Railway authorities concerned to show cause as to why proceedings in the Learned Court/Office of Circle Officer, Danapur, encroachment Case No.- 08/2016-17 and the petition displaced due to Ganga Rail Bridge Project, Patna and the petitioner's Land acquired for construction of Ganga Rail Bridge Scheme from Patna to Sonepur in which Exceed Land of acquired demarking for construction by the respondents as Ganga Rail Bridge Project, Patna and further for any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of the present writ application and without payment of excess acquired Land of petitioner construction is going on by respondents.” 3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition is dismissed. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U