ARGHYA BISWAS @ TENKU AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2084/2026 · 2026-07-27
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30475 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30475 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.632. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2084 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Ausgram Police Station case no. 215 of 2026 dated 22.05.2026 under Sections 448/323/325/387/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
And In the matter of : Arghya Biswas @ Tenku & Ors.
……Petitioners. Mr. Uday Sankar Chattoppadhyay Ms. Trisha Rakshit Ms. Rajashree Tah Ms. Aishwarya Datta
.....for the Petitioners. Ms. Swagata Mukhopadhya Das
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that the incident complained of are of the year 2021, 2023 and 2024 and the information was furnished in the year 2026, pursuant to which the case was registered. Another accused person namely, Biswajit Biswas has been granted bail. Petitioners are similarly placed as other accused person. Having considered the fact of the case, I am of the opinion that the case for investigation obviously has been made out but custodial detention of the petitioners are not warranted in the facts and circumstances of the present case. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners namely, Arghya Biswas, Tenku, Debdas Sarkar and Radhamadhab Mondal is allowed. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall furnish bonds subject to the satisfaction of the investigating
2 officer/arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As, the investigation of the case is in progress, petitioners shall make themselves available before the investigating officer within a period of 10 days from date and thereafter make themselves available as and when called for the by the investigating officer of the case. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2084 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)