Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30468 (PAT)

Bhushan Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5570/2026 · 2026-02-04

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5570 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2024 Thana- Mufassil District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1. Bhushan Yadav S/o Late Bino Yadav @ Bindeshwari Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 2. Amit Kumar S/o Bhushan Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 3. Avinash Kumar @ Shubham Kumar S/o Bhushan Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 4. Abhimanyu Kumar @ Abhimannu Kumar @ Shubham Kumar S/o Bhushan Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 5. Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Yadav S/o Jagdish Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 6. Golu Yadav @ Golu Kumar S/o Late Kundan Yadav R/o vill - Mathar, P.s.- Muffasil, Distt.- Khagaria 7. Ranveer Yadav @ Ranveer Kumar Randhir Kumar S/o Late Brahmdeo Yadav @ Mahendra Yadav @ Golu Yadav R/o vill - Rehua Murbariya, P.S.- Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & (3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Allegation against these petitioners is to assault Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5570 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 informant and others. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to previous enmity and land dispute between the parties, Maarpeet took place, in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. The injuries, caused by these petitioners, are simple in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the nature of injury, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024, G.R. No. 3655 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T