Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30466 (MAD)

Murugeswari v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Alangulam

CRL OP(MD)/10306/2026 · 2026-06-05

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 05/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 Murugeswari ... Petitioner/Accused No.2 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Viruthunagar District. (Crime No. 51 of 2026). ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 51 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Jagadeeshwaran R, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 9(B)(1)(a) of the Explosive Act, 1884, in Crime No.51 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 28.03.2026 at about 12.00 p.m, on secret information about the illegal manufacturing of crackers, the respondent police went to near a burial ground and found that the petitioner and her husband engaged in the manufacture of crackers in a shed. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and she was falsely implicated in this case and she has no way connected in the above said incident. He would further submit that already the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and the no previous case is pending against the petitioner. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner along with A1/husband illegally manufactured 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 crackers and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He would further submit that already the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and the no previous case is pending against the petitioner. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and no one was sustained injury and already the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and the no previous case is pending against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Satur, Virudhunagar District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of 4 weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 05.06.2026 dss To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Satur, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Viruthunagar District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.10306 of 2026 P. DHANABAL,J dss ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10306 of 2026 Date : 05/06/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis