Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30454 (CHH)

MAHESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/9064/2019 · 2026-08-02

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010369012019 2026:CGHC:33550 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9064 of 2019 1. Mahesh Kumar Yadav, S/o Late Foolsingh, aged about 38 years, presently posted as Electrician, Govt. Dental College, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Vinay Kumar Soni, S/o Late Bhikham Lal Soni, aged about 38 years, presently posted as Electrician, Govt. Dental College, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Anugrah Kerketta, S/o Shri Pawal Kerketta, aged about 35 years, presently posted as Electrician, Govt. Dental College, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Health and Medical Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh – 490002 2. The Director, Medical Education, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Office of Principal, Govt. Dental College, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : None present. For Respondents : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer. Single Bench:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 03/08/2026 SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.08.03 18:26:12 +0530 2 1. When the matter is called for hearing in two rounds, none present for the petitioners. No representation is made. 2. Mr. Sharad Mishra, learned State counsel, submits that the petitioners’ representation has been rejected vide Annexure R-2 which has not been questioned by them. 3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to question the order Annexure R-2 by filing a fresh petition, if so advised. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma