CRM-M-28952-2026 -1- 298 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28952-2026 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 Nirmal Singh @ Nimma …Petitioner vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Kumar Adia, AAG, Punjab. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 482 of Cr.P.C.) with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 23.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Special Court, Tarn Taran, whereby the bail of the petitioner was cancelled and the bail bonds and surety bonds were ordered to be forefeited. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 21.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner had appeared before the trial Court and was admtted to interim bail. He further submits that the cost of Rs.7,500/- has been deposited by the petitioner with the District Legal Services Authority, Tarn Taran. 3. Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the factual submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. HEMLATA 2026.07.17 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-28952-2026 -2- 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 21.05.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to appear before the trial Court on each and every date of hearing and shall not remain absent from the trial Court proceedings, without prior permission of the trial Court. 5. The trial Court shall be at liberty to impose any other condition(s) as it may deem fit and appropriate. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 16.07.2026 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2026.07.17 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document