1 CGHC010157092021 2026:CGHC:33059 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2885 of 2021 1 - Abhishek Kumar Choubey S/o Naresh Kumar Choubey Aged About 37 Years R/o Qr 1 A, Street 35, Sector 4, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Deepesh Trivedi S/o Krishna Trivedi Aged About 41 Years 10/489, New Sarafa Line, Kt Tower, Sadar Bazaar, Budhapara, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sunil Kumar Sahu C/o Arun Kumar Sahu Aged About 39 Years R/o Near Durga Para, Santoshi Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Prabhu Dayal S/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 40 Years R/o E 108, Shiv Mandir Garden, Devendra Nagar, Sector 5, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director Public Education, Directorate Of Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Third Floor, New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.. 6 - District Education Officer, Education Department Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 7 - District Education Officer, Education Department Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Delhi Public School Through Its Principal, Risali Sector, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 9 - Krishna Public School Through Its Principal, Kamal Vihaar, Dunda, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 10 - Gujrati English Medium Hr. Sec. School Through Its Principal, Devendra Nagar, Sector 4, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For the Petitioner : None. For respondent Nos.1 to 7 : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, GA. For respondent No.9 : Ms. Apoorva Ghore, Advocate For respondent No.10 : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 30.07.2026 1. This case was earlier listed on 20.07.2026 and on the said date, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition and case was adjourned to be listed on 23.07.2026. Thereafter, case was listed on 27.07.2026 and on the said date also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and case was directed to be listed on 30.07.2026. 2. Today also when the case is take-up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of above facts, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursing this writ petition, therefore, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. CC as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge J.