DILIP KUMAR ALIAS DILIPYADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./702/2026 · 2026-04-07
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:9743
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 702 of 2026
1. Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Yadav, son of Paro Yadav
2. Paro Yadav, Son of Late Prem Yadav
3. Sanjay @ Sanjay Yadav, son of Paro Yadav
… … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioners : Mr. Deepankar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, APP
For the Informant : Md. Ayub Ansari, Advocate
---
08/07.04.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 05.10.2025 in connection with Deori P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 109, 75, 303(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and there is previous enmity between the parties. The learned counsel has further submitted that so far as petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, they were holding lathi in their hand.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party- state, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per the bail petition itself, the petitioners have two criminal antecedents and there is direct allegation against the petitioners who had joined together to assault causing grievous injuries to number of persons including female members of the family.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegations made against the petitioners and the fact that number of persons have suffered grievous injury, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail and hence, this bail
2026:JHHC:9743
2
application is rejected.
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:07.04.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:08.04.2026