Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30422 (PNJ)

KAMLESH RANI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/8485/2026 · 2026-07-17

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRWP-8485-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRWP-8485-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 KAMLESH RANI ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Siddarth, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to safeguard the life and liberty of the petitioner and enquired of false cases against petitioner husband and not to harass by the police officials and not calling him in police station again and again. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits after arguing for some time that petitioner submitted a representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur to consider and decide representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) moved by petitioner and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.17 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRWP-8485-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent respondent No.3- Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur, to decide the aforesaid representation dated 02.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.3 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 17.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.17 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document