Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30422 (CAL)

SAJAL PAUL AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

FMA/1152/2022 · 2026-07-27

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 17 27.07.2026 Court No.04 B.K.N F.M.A. 1152 of 2022 With CAN 1 of 2022 Sajal Paul & Anr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Samrat Chowdhury … for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 4. 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. The learned advocate appears for the respondent nos. 2 & 4. He submits that the writ petition is still pending. In view of the writ petitioners’ age, there is no scope for their reengagement. 3. Without going into the merits of such submission and since none appears on behalf of the writ petitioners/appellants, we dismiss the appeal in default. 4. Pending application is also dismissed in default. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)