GAUTAM BANERJEE v. ASSITANT PF COMMISSIONER DAMAGE & ORS
WPA/24827/2014 · 2026-07-27
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30417 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30417 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27.07. 2026 item No.06 g.b. ct. no. 30
WPA 24827 of 2014 With CAN 2 of 2015, CAN 3 of 2020, CAN 4 of 2025
Gautam Banerjee Vs. Assistant P.F. Commissioner (Damage) & Ors.
Mr. Anil Kr. Gupta …..For The Respondent No.1
1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent no.1 be kept with the record.
2. The matter was mentioned by the petitioner stating that the matter has become infructuous and necessary orders may be passed.
3. None appears for the petitioner on call.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present.
5. Considering the said facts, the writ application stands dismissed for default.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Connected applications, if any, stands disposed of.
[ Shampa Dutt(Paul), J.]