Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30417 (CAL)

GAUTAM BANERJEE v. ASSITANT PF COMMISSIONER DAMAGE & ORS

WPA/24827/2014 · 2026-07-27

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.07. 2026 item No.06 g.b. ct. no. 30 WPA 24827 of 2014 With CAN 2 of 2015, CAN 3 of 2020, CAN 4 of 2025 Gautam Banerjee Vs. Assistant P.F. Commissioner (Damage) & Ors. Mr. Anil Kr. Gupta …..For The Respondent No.1 1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent no.1 be kept with the record. 2. The matter was mentioned by the petitioner stating that the matter has become infructuous and necessary orders may be passed. 3. None appears for the petitioner on call. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present. 5. Considering the said facts, the writ application stands dismissed for default. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. Connected applications, if any, stands disposed of. [ Shampa Dutt(Paul), J.]