1 CGHC010238152026 2026:CGHC:33253 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3731 of 2026 1 - M/s Miura Infrastructure Private Limited A Company Registered Under Companies Act, 1956, Having Its Office At 603, Shilpangan, Block L B-1, Sector Iii, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700098 Through Its Authorised Representative Shri Sudhakar, Aged 41 Years, S/o Shri Tulsi Ram, R/o House No. E W S 23, 32 Acres, Housing Board, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, Distt. Durg Pin Code 490026 2 - Gaurav Himatsinghka S/o Dipak Himatsinghka Aged About 55 Years Managing Director, Miura Infrastructure Private Limited, R/o Alipore Terrace, 8th Floor, 12 Raja Santosh Road, Majherhat Bridge, Alipore, Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700027 ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Ministry Of Revenue And Disaster Management Through Its Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Department of Commerce And Industries Through Its Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 3 - Directorate of Industries Through Its Director, Udyog Bhawan, Telibandha, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA UTTEJ KUMAR RAJU Date: 2026.08.03 10:36:59 +0530 2 4 - District Trade And Industries Centre (D I C) Durg Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chief General Manager, Durg Malviya Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - Tehsildar Tehsil Bhilai-3, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is downloaded from CIS Periphery.) For Petitioners : Mr. Harshmander Rastogi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Abhinav Kardekar, Advocate. For State/Respondent : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional A.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance raised by the petitioners in the present petition has been redressed and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the said prayer. 3. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, and there being no objection from the State counsel/respondent, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge U.K. Raju