Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3040 (JK)

MOHD SHARIEF MATOO v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY FOREST DEPTT AND OTHERS

WP(C)/2111/2023 · 2026-09-08

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2111/2023 Mohd. Sharief Matoo ….Petitioner Through: None Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (08.09.2026) 01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last several dates of hearing and, admittedly, the petitioner has not appeared in the matter since the year 2023. The continuous absence of the petitioner clearly shows that he has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 02. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 08.09.2026 SUNIL Serial No. 77 Supplementary List-1