MOHD SHARIEF MATOO v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY FOREST DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2111/2023 · 2026-09-08
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3040 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3040 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2111/2023
Mohd. Sharief Matoo
….Petitioner
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondents
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (08.09.2026)
01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last several dates of hearing and, admittedly, the petitioner has not appeared in the matter since the year
2023. The continuous absence of the petitioner clearly shows that he has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
02. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
08.09.2026
SUNIL
Serial No. 77 Supplementary List-1