Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30397 (KAR)

SMT. MAHALAKSHMI v. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

WP/11860/2023 · 2026-06-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30035 WP NO.11860 OF 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.11860 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHALAKSHMI W/O SANJEEVAIAH M., AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT MALLAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 2. SMT. SHOBA W/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT TAMMARASANA HALLI VILLAGE, T.B. POST, NEAR HESSARAGHATTA LAKE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU - 560 089. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YATISH M.H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MOHAN M.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AEREKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, HESSARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 089. REP. BY PDO THIMMEGOWDA. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATH, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30035 WP NO.11860 OF 2023 MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, YELLAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. 3. MUNIYAMMA SINCE DEAD, REP. BY LRS. 3(a). BYLAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. 3(b). VENKATARAMA S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS. 3(c). MUNIBYLAPPA S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. 3(d). MUNIRAJU S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. 3(e). SMT. BYLAMMA D/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. 3(f). HANUMANTHU S/O LATE MUNIYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 3(a) TO 3(f) ARE R/AT BUDUMANAHALLI VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. VISHWANATH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R3(a) TO R3(f); R1 AND R2 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30035 WP NO.11860 OF 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1-PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AEREKERE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, HESSARAGHATTA HOBLI TO TRANSFER THE KHATHA OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS AND ISSUE KHATHA IN FORM NO.16 BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION/APPLICATION OF PETITIONERS DATED 17.08.2022, 07.12.2022 AND 02.02.2023 VIDE ANNEXURES 'G' TO 'K'; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioners are seeking direction to the respondent No.1 to transfer the Khata of the schedule property in the name of petitioners by considering the representation/application made by the petitioners dated 17.08.2022, 07.12.2022 and 02.02.2023 produced at Annexures 'G' to 'K'. 2. Heard Sri. Yatish M.H., learned counsel on behalf of Sri. Mohan M.S., appearing for petitioners; Sri. V. Vishwanath Shetty, learned counsel appearing for respondents 3(a) to 3(f). 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30035 WP NO.11860 OF 2023 representation dated 17.08.2022 (Annexure-G), it is forthcoming that the Khata in respect of the schedule property has been changed in favour of one Muniyamma illegally and therefore, petitioners are seeking change of the same in their favour. Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that the petitioners have to challenge the change of Khata made in favour of Muniyamma before the competent authority. Accordingly, reserving liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent authority, with petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3