1 CGHC010102542025 2026:CGHC:33368 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 162 of 2026 1 - Smt. Gauri Bagga W/o Rajesh Kumar Bagga, Aged About 38 Years R/o Near Housiya Maszid, Santoshi Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number Cg-04,jb-3556) ...Applicant versus 1 - Kripachari S/o Parmanand, Aged About 27 Years (Father Of Minor Deceased Pintu Miri), R/o Village And Post Office Garhphuljhar, Police Station And Tahsil Basana, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Ashoda Miri W/o Shri Kripachari, Aged About 26 Years (Mother Of Minor Deceased Pintu Miri), R/o Village And Post Office Garhphuljhar, Police Station And Tahsil Basana, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 3 - Sikandar Rai S/o Tulsiram, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village And Post Office Arjunda, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund (C.G.).......(Driver Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number Cg-04, Jb-3556). 4 - Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Resident Of Branch Office Shop No. 516, 5th Floor National Corporation Park Commercial Complex J.E. Road Raipur (C.G.)........(Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Bearing Registration Number Cg-04, Jb-3556). ... Non-applicants For Applicant : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For Non-applicant No.4 : Mr. Rahul Singh Thakur, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 03.08.2026 1) Heard on I.A. No.1, an application for condonation of delay in filing appeal. 2) Upon due consideration, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the 2 restoration application (MCC) is condoned. 3) Also heard on application for restoration of MAC No.303 of 2025 which was dismissed vide order dated 05.02.2025. 4) Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant could not deposit the security/mandatory amount of Rs.25,000/- at the time of filing of MAC No.303 of 2025. He would further submit that subsequently, the said amount has been deposited and, therefore, this application may be allowed and MAC No.303 of 2025 may be restored to its original number. 5) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for Non-applicant No.4 would oppose the submissions. 6) Heard. 7) Having considered the fact that the security amount of Rs.25,000/- was not deposited along with the memo of appeal, whereas it is mandatory on the part of the owner of the vehicle to deposit the sum of Rs.25,000/-. As the mandatory amount was not deposited by the applicant herein, owner of the vehicle, therefore, MAC No.303 of 2025 was dismissed. I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order passed in MAC No.303 of 2025. Accordingly, this MCC fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Rekha