Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30385 (PNJ)

VIVEK v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/23594/2026 · 2026-07-16

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (204) CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.07.2026 VIVEK … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh Thind, Advocate for Ms. Himani Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 read with Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 (corresponding Sections of Cr.P.C. are 438 and 482) for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.225 dated 20.07.2025 under Sections 115(2) [323 IPC], 190 [149 IPC], 191 (3) [148 IPC], 333 [452 IPC] and 351 (2) [506 IPC] of the BNS, 2023 [Sections 3(2)(va) and 3(1)(s) of SC and ST Act, 2018 added later on and subsequently deleted on 12.03.2026 registered at Po- lice Station Saran, District Faridabad, Haryana. 2. This Court, vide order dated 01.05.2026, had directed the petitioner to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer and join investigation and in the event of their arrest, they were ordered to be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 482(2) of the BNSS (erstwhile Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.). POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-23594-2026 (O&M) 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 01.05.2026 passed by the Court, the petitioner has joined and cooperated with the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel on instructions states that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for custodial interrogation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 01.05.2026 is made ab- solute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the condi- tions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 16thJuly, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.17 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document