1 CGHC010407752025 2026:CGHC:33277 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 2381 of 2025 1 - Dinesh Kumar Dahariya S/o Badri Prasad Dahariya Aged About 30 Years R/o Village- Kotela Bhatha Ward No. 8, Near Jugnu Pond, Chowki-Jevra- Sirsa, P.S. Pulgaon, District Durg C.G. (Driver Of Vehicle Van No. C G- 07-E-1578) 2 - M/s Krishna Public School, Address- Nehru Nagar, P.S. Supela, District Durg C.G. (Registered Driver Of Vehicle Van No. C G- 07-E- 1578) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Osla Sahu W/o Late Moraj Dhwaj Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Bajrang Para, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Near Karma Bhawan, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G. (Claimant) (Wife) 2 - Sakshi Sahu D/o Late Moraj Dhwaj Sahu Aged About 13 Years Minor Through Mother Smt. Osla Sahu, W/o Moraj Dhwaj Sahu, R/o Kohka, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G., R/o Bajrang Para, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Near Karma Bhawan, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G. (Claimant) (Daughter) 3 - Homesh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Moraj Dhwaj Sahu Aged About 5 Years Minor Through Mother Smt. Osla Sahu, W/o Moraj Dhwaj Sahu, R/o Kohka, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G., R/o Bajrang Para, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Near Karma Bhawan, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G. (Claimant) (Son). 2 4 - Shakuntala Sahu W/o Dakwar Lal Sahu Aged About 62 Years R/o Bajrang Para, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Near Karma Bhawan, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G. (Claimant) (Mother). 5 - Sakwar Lal Sahu S/o Panchram Sahu Aged About 69 Years R/o Bajrang Para, Kohka, Ward No. 8, Near Karma Bhawan, Police Station- Supela, District Durg C.G. (Claimant) (Father). 6 - Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited, Through The Branch Manager, Second Floor Shiv Mohan Bhawan, Vidhan Sabha Road, Pandri, Raipur C.G. (Policy No. O G -22-3765-1812-00000044 For The Period From 25.11.2021 To 24.11.2022)(Insurer Of Vehicle Van No. C G 07-E-1578) ... Respondent(s) For Applicants : None For Respondent No. 1 to 5 : None For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Ashutosh Rathore, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 31 / 07 / 2026 1. None appears on behalf of the appellants in second round. 2. It transpires from the record and the prayer made in the appeal that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge pekde Digitally signed by VIJAY BHARATRAO PEKDE Date: 2026.08.01 11:20:19 +0530