Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27.07.2026 Serial no. 618 [G.S.D]
CRM (A) 1819 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Manikchak PS Case No. 28 of 2026 dated 18.01.2026 corresponding to GR No. 2310 of 2026 u/s 329(3)/118(2)/109/3(5) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Ujjwal Mandal &Anr.
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Arup Sarkar Mr. Sourav Mukherjee
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Gurudas Mitra Mr. Utsav Datta
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been implicated by the complainant. Learned advocate for the State refers to the injury report. I have considered the nature of injuries and the statement of the other witnesses. Having considered the same, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (A) 1819 of 2026 is dismissed.
2 Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)