Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30367 (PNJ)

SHAM LAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/38418/2026 · 2026-07-16

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38418-2026 Date of decision :16.07.2026 SHAM LAL ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) Mr. Vikas Bali, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the complainant and has filed his power of attorney. The same is taken on record. Since there is no impugned order as of today, the present petition seeking grant of anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Faced with this situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach this Court once again if and when the Sessions Court dismisses his bail application. Ordered accordingly. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 16.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.17 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document