Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30364 (KAR)

M NARAYANA v. MUNIVENKTAPPA

RFA/726/2019 · 2026-07-22

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010216412019 NC: 2026:KHC:38026 RFA No. 726 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 726 OF 2019 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. M NARAYANA S/O LATE ABBAIAH @ MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 2. SMT NEELAMMA W/O SRI M NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BOTH R/A NO.695, SITE NO.5, TIGALARAPALYA, HOODI VILLAGE, BANGALORE-560 048 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH B MUCHANDI AND SRI. RAMESH R.M, ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. MUNIVENKATAPPA S/O LATE CHINMUNIYAPPA @ DODDAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRINIVASA @ SEENA S/O LATE CHINMUNIYAPPA @ DODDAMUNIYAPPA, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010216412019 NC: 2026:KHC:38026 RFA No. 726 of 2019 AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 3. SHANKARA S/O LATE CHINMUNIYAPPA @ DODDAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, 4. NAGARAJ S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDENTS OF NO.124, 5TH CROSS, THIGALARAPALYA, K.R.PURA HOBLI, MAHADEVAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 048. 5. MUNIKRISHNA S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/A 5TH CROSS, THIGALARAPALYA, K.R.PURA HOBLI, MAHADEVAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560 048. 6. K NAGARAJU S/O LATE H.K VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/A NO.7, 7TH CROSS, ANEPALYA, ADUGODI POST, BANGALORE-560 030 7. LATE VENKATASWAMY S/O LATE H.K VENKATAPPA, (SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS) (A) MANJULA, W/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010216412019 NC: 2026:KHC:38026 RFA No. 726 of 2019 (B) SANDYA D/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, (C) HEMANTH S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS, D.7(A) TO (C) ARE RESIDING NEAR ANAMMA TEMPLE, BHAVANI ROAD, HIBGODI VILLAGE, BOMMASANDRA POST, ANEKAL-560 099. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC.,AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.09.2018 PASSED IN OS NO.5610/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation for the appellants even on the second call. 2. Despite granting sufficient opportunity to comply with the office objections, learned counsel for the appellants remained absent on 03.11.2025 and 02.03.2026 before the - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010216412019 NC: 2026:KHC:38026 RFA No. 726 of 2019 Registrar (I&M) and District Judge 00D1 respectively and failed comply with the office objections. Though the matter is of the year 2019, it seems that neither the appellants nor the counsel for the appellants are interested in prosecuting this appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21