CWP-11937 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 Upender Singh and others State of Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. India has been filed by the petitioner of Mandamus petitioners appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in others, SCC OnLine 2. petitioners by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petition leading case CWP State of Hary 2026 titled as ‘ others’ to identical to that of the petitioners 11937-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Upender Singh and others Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh and Paras Chaudhary, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a writ in the nature andamus directing the respondents to on the post on which they are working appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘ , SCC OnLine SC 3826’. At the very outset, learned Senior Counsel for the has placed reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petition leading case CWP-1770-2026, titled as ‘Deepak Singh and others State of Haryana and others’ including petition bearing No. 2026 titled as ‘Dr. Ravi Godara and others to submit that the grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is identical to that of the petitioners (in CWP- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11937-2026 Date of Decision: 17.07.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunil K. Nehra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh and Paras Chaudhary, Advocates Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana. etition under Article 226 of the Constitution of for issuance of a writ in the nature directing the respondents to regularize the services of the on the post on which they are working from the date of their appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment ‘Jaggo vs. Union of India and learned Senior Counsel for the reliance upon a judgment dated 12.05.2026 passed ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having Deepak Singh and others vs. petition bearing No. CWP-7007- Dr. Ravi Godara and others vs. State of Haryana and grievance of all the 50 petitioners herein is -7007-2026) as they belonged etition under Article 226 of the Constitution of for issuance of a writ in the nature regularize the services of the from the date of their appointment with all consequential benefits in view of the judgment Union of India and RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.17 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-11937 to the same Department regard, learned service of all the petitioners herein para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and 20 of the book), as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus service. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in terms (supra) as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 passed in Deepak Singh’s case (supra) 3. ‘no objection’ to the same. 4. 5. parties, present Civil Writ Petition stands to the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claim of and pass a speaking order thereupon within a period of today, whil Jaggo’s case (supra) in Deepak Singh’s case (supra) 6. 17.07.2026 rishu 11937-2026 -2- to the same Department, rendering more than 10 years of service regard, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners refers to of all the petitioners herein as enumerated in tabulated form in para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and 20 of the , as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus ice. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed of in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 passed in Deepak Singh’s case (supra). Learned counsel for the respondent ‘no objection’ to the same. Heard. Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present Civil Writ Petition stands to the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh consideration to the claim of each of the and pass a speaking order thereupon within a period of le keeping in mind the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case (supra) as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 Deepak Singh’s case (supra). Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable more than 10 years of service. In this petitioners refers to the length of enumerated in tabulated form in para No. 2 of the writ petition (at page No. 19 and 20 of the paper- , as per which all the petitioners have rendered 10 years plus ice. It is, therefore, prayed that the present petition may be disposed Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 passed in for the respondent-State submits that he Accordingly, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of, with a direction to the State of Haryana/concerned Department to accord fresh each of the petitioners for regularization; and pass a speaking order thereupon within a period of 08 months from judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in as well as judgment of this Court dated 12.05.2026 Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.17 17:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.