HARVINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRM-M/37667/2026 · 2026-07-14
Shalini Singh Nagpal
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30335 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30335 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-37667
126
Harvinder Kaur and another State of Punjab and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL
Present:
Shalini Singh Nagpal, J.
1.
directing official respondents to for stealing and destroying the good
2.
at 07:30 PM, respondents No.4 and 5, who petitioners accompanied by 25 petitioner’s shop goods were stored and illegally took possession of the shop. The matter was reported to the police but no action was taken. submits that a civil suit was filed by the respondent disputed property 16.06.2026 and 17.06.2026, defendants (petitioners) were restrained from interfering of the plaintiff due course of law. regard to the protection of life and liberty be decided 37667-2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harvinder Kaur and another
VERSUS State of Punjab and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Sumeetpal Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab
*** Singh Nagpal, J.(Oral) The petition under Section 528 of BNSS official respondents to take legal action against for stealing and destroying the goods of petitioner’s
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on 19.06.2026 at 07:30 PM, respondents No.4 and 5, who petitioners accompanied by 25-30 unknown petitioner’s shop, locked the entrance gate of the store, goods were stored and illegally took possession of the shop. The matter was reported to the police but no action was taken. submits that a civil suit was filed by the respondent disputed property before the court of Civil Judge (J 16.06.2026 and 17.06.2026, defendants (petitioners) were restrained from of the plaintiffs (private respondents due course of law. He prays that represent regard to the protection of life and liberty be decided 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37667-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026
Petitioners
Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL dvocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab. Section 528 of BNSS has been filed for take legal action against private respondents petitioner’s shop.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on 19.06.2026 at 07:30 PM, respondents No.4 and 5, who were close relations of the 30 unknown persons forced entry into nce gate of the store, where electrical goods were stored and illegally took possession of the shop. The matter was reported to the police but no action was taken. Learned counsel further submits that a civil suit was filed by the respondents in respect of the before the court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ludhiana on 16.06.2026 and 17.06.2026, defendants (petitioners) were restrained from (private respondents) in the property, except in that representation of the petitioners with regard to the protection of life and liberty be decided by an early date. M) .2026 s Respondents
for s
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on 19.06.2026 close relations of the forced entry into where electrical goods were stored and illegally took possession of the shop. The matter was
Learned counsel further in respect of the on 16.06.2026 and 17.06.2026, defendants (petitioners) were restrained from in the property, except in ation of the petitioners with KAPIL 2026.07.14 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-37667
3. 4. accepts notice on behalf of the official representation filed by the petitioners, DDR No.11 dated 29.06.2026, under Section 115(3) had been registered. under Section 126 and civil in nature
5. to forcible poss have filed a civil suit wherein an petitioners. The is already seized filed by the petitioner. required to be issued. 6. 7. 14.07.2026 Kapil 37667-2026 (O&M) Notice of motion to official respon Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents representation filed by the petitioners, DDR No.11 dated 29.06.2026, under Section 115(3) had been registered. Police had also taken preventive under Section 126 and 170 of BNSS. He further civil in nature and no intervention by the police was required. The representation (Annexure P to forcible possession of a shop H.B. Electrical by filed a civil suit wherein an injunction . The dispute is essentially civil in nature and the competent court eized of the matter. Police, too, has taken action on representation filed by the petitioner. In the wake of nature required to be issued. The petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Whether Reportable :
2
Notice of motion to official respondents. Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, AAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, respondents. He submits that on the representation filed by the petitioners, DDR No.11 dated 29.06.2026, under Police had also taken preventive action He further submits that the matter was and no intervention by the police was required. (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner relates ession of a shop H.B. Electrical by private respondents who injunction order has been issued against is essentially civil in nature and the competent court . Police, too, has taken action on representation nature of the dispute, no direction is The petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned :
Yes/No
Yes/No who is present in Court, submits that on the representation filed by the petitioners, DDR No.11 dated 29.06.2026, under action r was filed by the petitioner relates respondents who against is essentially civil in nature and the competent court .
Police, too, has taken action on representation dispute, no direction is
(SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) KAPIL 2026.07.14 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document