[2026:JHHC:10065] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.336 of 2026 ------ Dineshwar Singh, aged about 62 years, son of Lalo Singh, resident of village- Madgada, P.O.- Peltol, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Chatra, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogendra Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-08-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 277 of 2025 arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Most. Prema Devi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that so far, no witness has been examined in this case. It is then submitted that charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on suspicion because he earlier stated to kill the informant and her mother. It is also submitted that except the confessional statement of the informant, there is no other materials available in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.07.2025 as is evident from para-24 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-22 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Chatra in connection with S.T. Case No. 277 of 2025 arising out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 08.04.2026 Saroj/