Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30316 (PNJ)

LAKHWINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/17279/2023 · 2026-07-16

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[270] Lakhwinder Singh State of Punjab and others Coram : PANKAJ JAIN [1] present writ petition [2] [3] disposed off 16.07.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17279 Date of Decision : Lakhwinder Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Raj Kumar Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. None for respondent Nos.5 & 6 to 9. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, learned counsel writ petition has become rendered infructuous Dismissed as infructuous. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 16.07.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17279-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.07.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Advocate Mr. Harpreet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. None for respondent Nos.5 & 6 to 9. ounsel for the petitioner states that the has become rendered infructuous by efflux of time. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No states that the All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.17 12:29 I agree to specified portions of this document