Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30304 (CHH)

GRAM PANCHAYAT, DAMAPUR BAZAR, v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/142/2023 · 2026-07-30

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010011042023 2026:CGHC:33159 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 142 of 2023 1 - Gram Panchayat, Damapur Bazar, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kabirdham (C.G.), Through Its Sarpanch-Safiq Beg S/o Muharram Beg, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village - Damapur Bazar, Tahsil - Pandaria, District - Kubirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector, Kabirdham, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - The Sub - Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pandaria, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Satish Patre, Sadhan News Reporter, Kabirdham, District - Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 31/07/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting-aside/quashing the impugned order dated 02.12.2022 (Annexure P / 1 ) and further be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 not to take any coercive step against the petitioner. 10.3 To kindly grant any other relief which may be deem fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat