D/L674 24.07.2026 Bpg. dismissed C.R.M. (A) 2192 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Chopra Police Station Case No.414 of 2024 dated 24.06.2024 under Sections 341/323/325/326/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code; Biplab Das Versus The State of West Bengal Ms. Priya Chakraborty. …for the petitioner. Mrs. Suman Agarwal Mr. Manoj Singh. …for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there was a scuffle between both the parties, both the families were injured and in spite of the same, unilateral investigation is carried on and the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. Petitioner apprehends arrest, as such, prays for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the injured as well as the injury report. Having considered the statement of the injured, prima facie, it reflects that the petitioner is not similarly situated as the other accused persons who may have been granted relief, as prayed for. 2 Accordingly, I am not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail in CRM(A)2192 of 2026 is dismissed. Petitioner, if so advised, will surrender before the learned trial court at the earliest. Learned trial court would independently consider the regular bail of the petitioner without being influenced by any observations made by this Court. Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)