Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30301 (PAT)

CHANDRADEO SINGH v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./1590/2026 · 2026-01-28

Alok Kumar Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1590 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2025 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. CHANDRADEO SINGH S/O LATE ALAKHDEO SINGH @ LATE ALAKHDEO MAHTO R/o vill - Chatra, P.s.- Khajauli, Dist.- Madhubani 2. Phulo Devi @ Phul Devi W/o Chandradeo Singh R/o vill - Chatra, P.s.- Khajauli, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 195 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 126, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that at about 9 P.M. on 13.09.2025 the informant was sitting at his door, at the same time, Chandradeo Singh, Naveen Kumar Singh and Phulo Devi arrived there and Chandradeo Singh asked him as to where he had deposited the land survey papers and after his refusal Chandradeo Singh, who happened to be his younger Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1590 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 brother and on his protest, they assaulted him. It is next alleged that during course of such assault, Chandradeo Singh, with an intention to kill, made an assault over his head by means of farsa, causing blooding injury and when his son Shankar Kumar Singh came there, he was assaulted by Naveen Kumar Singh by means of lathi on his head, causing injury and they all snatched golden Hanumani locket of his son, valued about Rs. 10 thousand and threatened him to kill his entire family members. The informant then get his treatment at Primary Health Centre. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent. The entire prosecution story is false, fabricated and concocted. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no manner of occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. It is further submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case due to pattidari dispute and ulterior motive of the informant to harass the petitioners. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the fact that petitioner no. 1 (Chandradeo Singh) is said to have assaulted the informant with farsa on his head but the injury report shows that it has resulted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1590 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 in simple injury. There is no specific allegation against petitioner no. 2 Phulo Devi. From the reading of the FIR, it appears that this is an internal family dispute with regard to some land survey papers and also taking into account the fact that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani I/C Successor Court in connection with Khajauli P.S. Case No. 195 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Gaurav Sinha/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U