Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3030 (GUJ)

VAJID @ CHIYA AYUB MALEK v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/18058/2026 · 2026-08-13

Sanjeev J Thaker

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/18058/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 18058 of 2026 ========================================================== VAJID @ CHIYA AYUB MALEK Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ========================================================== Appearance: MR AMIT D SHAH(11232) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER Date : 13/08/2026 ORAL ORDER 1. This is an application for temporary bail by the applicant on the ground of arranging funds for his father’s illness. 2. Earlier, i.e. on 06.08.2026, learned advocate Ms.J.C. Bhatt has submitted that she has instructions to appear for and on behalf of the applicant and will file her vakalatnama in place of learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah. However, the cause list shows that she did not file her vakalatnama till date. 3. Be that as it may. However, today, when the matter is called out in second call at 4:00 p.m., neither learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah is present nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt remained present on behalf of the applicant nor learned advocate Ms.Bhatt has filed her R/CR.MA/18058/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026 vakalatnama replacing learned advocate Mr.Amit D. Shah for the applicant. 4. Considering the fact that this application is filed by the applicant for temporary bail on the ground of arranging funds for his father’s illness, however, the matter could not be proceeded for one reason or the other. 5. Today, learned APP has placed on record the jail remarks. 6. Considering the jail remarks, it transpires that the applicant has been convicted under the Bharatiya Nyas Sanhita, the Gujarat Police Act and the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime Act and is in jail since 23.07.2025 only. 7. Moreover, the medical papers annexed to this application at Annexure-‘C’ Colly. do not inspire any confidence. 8. Further, the learned trial Court has, by taking into consideration the affidavit filed by the Investigating Officer, observed in the order that there is no serious medical illness of the applicant’s father. Page 2 of 3 R/CR.MA/18058/2026 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026 9. In view of above, this application needs to be rejected on the ground of conduct of the applicant, stale cause and in absence of justifiable grounds/reasons and is rejected accordingly. (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J) M.H. DAVE/82 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/08/2026 17:41:42