HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 2415 of 2026 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J. HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J. 1. List revised. None appears to press the petition on behalf of the petitioner whereas learned Standing Counsel is present. 2. At present, petition appears to be defective inasmuch as the relief is not clear and cause of action has also not been clearly identified. 3. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed as defective with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh/proper petition. May 5, 2026 Prakhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Muqeem Ahmad, Mushtaq Ahmad, Naman Agrawal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Siddharth Shankar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAKHAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad