Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2026 DAILYLAW 303 (MAN)

State of Manipur and 4 Ors v. K Shantabiren Singh

MC(WA)/17/2026 · 2026-05-06

A Guneshwar Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Supp.-1, Sl. No. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WA) No. 17 of 2026 Ref:- Rev. Petn. No. 41 of 2025 1. The State of Manipur through the Commissioner (Works), Government of Manipur at Secretariat Building, Mantripukhri, Imphal West – 795001. 2. The Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Manipur at Khuyathong, Imphal – 795001. 3. The Executive Engineer, Building Division No. III, P.W.D., Manipur at Khoyathong – 795001. 4. The Commissioner/Secretary (Health), Government of Manipur at Secretariat Building, Mantripukhri, Imphal West – 795001. 5. The Director of Health Services at Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795001. ……Applicants/Appellants -Versus- Shri K. Shantabiren Singh, aged about 62 years, S/o (l) K. Kullachandra Singh of Taobungkhok Awang, P.O. Langjing & P.S. Patsoi, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795001. ….. Respondent BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA For the Applicants/Appellants :: Mr. Oinam Ratan Kumar, State Counsel Date of Hearing :: 07.05.2026 Date of Order :: 07.05.2026 SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2026.05.07 17:29:02 +05'30' O R D E R (M. Sundar, CJ) [1] Captioned ‘MC’ (‘Miscellaneous Case’) has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of certified copy. [2] When the matter was taken up, Mr. Oinam Ratan Kumar, learned State Counsel was before this Court. [3] It came to light that even the date on which application for certified copy (online) was made has not been mentioned in the MC affidavit. It is bereft of requisite material particulars. [4] Faced with the above situation, learned State Counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned MC but made a further plea to preserve the rights and contentions of MC applicants (State) to file another MC application with the same prayer giving better and fuller particulars which are necessary to buttress the prayer. [5] In this regard, the endorsement made by learned State Counsel in the case file is as follows : [6] In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned MC is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions as set out supra. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE FR/NFR Sushil P.S. I : Upload forthwith P.S. II : All concerned will stand bound by web copy uploaded in High Court website inter-alia as the same is QR coded.