Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 303 (HP)

STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER v. Pawan Kumar

CWP/4242/2026 · 2026-04-01

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4242/2026 a/w connected matters Decided on: 01.04.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1. CWP No. 4242/2026 State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. …..Petitioners Versus Pawan Kumar .....Respondent 2. CWP No.4243/2026 State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. …..Petitioner Versus Daulat Ram .....Respondent 3. CWP No. 4244/2026 State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. …..Petitioner Versus Keshav Chand .....Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocates General & Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. For the Respondents: Nemo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioners-State feels aggrieved against orders (Annexure P-1) in all the writ petitions passed by the Deputy 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Labour Commissioner-cum-Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh under Section 7(7) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, ordering payment of gratuity in favour of the respondents in terms thereof. 2. It is not in dispute that the facts of these cases are almost similar to the facts of State of H.P. & Ors. Versus Binu Ram2, which, in turn, was based upon Bindumati Versus State of H.P. and others3. Decision in Bindumati3 is stated to have been accepted and implemented by the respondents therein. That the issue of law involved in the instant cases is the same as was involved in Binu Ram2 & Bindumati3 and further that the same is covered against the petitioners-State under the aforesaid decisions. Accordingly, on the analogy of the decisions in Binu Ram2 & Bindumati3 and following the reasoning therein, these writ petitions are dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 01st 2026 Judge rohit 2 CWP No.15443/2024, decided on 24.02.2026 3 CWP No.4632/2025, decided on 07.11.2025