CWP-12815-2026 [1] 250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12815-2026 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Udai Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. R.K. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Sakeel Ahmed, Advocate for respondent No.6. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from their land which was demolished on 12.01.2026 vide order dated 06.01.2026 (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not challenging the order dated 06.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) but has prayed that till the time, petition under Section 7 of the Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 is not allowed, the petitioner should not be dispossessed from the premises which is the subject matter of the said PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-12815-2026 [2] proceedings. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.6-Gram Panchayat has very fairly submitted that the action which has already been taken is only in pursuance of the order dated 06.01.2026 (Annexure P-1) and since the petitioner has not challenged the said order, nothing further remains to be decided in the present case. It is further fairly submitted that till the time, eviction order is passed in favour of Gram Panchayat i.e., respondent No.6, they would not dispossess the petitioner from the premises which is the subject matter of the petition filed under Section 7 of the Act. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the same satisfies the petitioner and has submitted that in view of the same, the present writ petition be disposed of but respondent No.6 be bound by the statement made before this Court. 5. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of. Respondent No.6 would be bound by the statement made on his behalf before this Court. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 14.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document