1 CGHC010185692026 2026:CGHC:33231 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 82 of 2026 1 - Maksi Million Minj Son Of Mathiyas Minj, Aged About 64 Years R/o H I G 07 Housing Board Colony, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Nagar Korba, Tehsil And District Korba (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Pooja Jain W/o Sunil Kumar Jain, Aged About 52 Years R/o 102 Vidhya Chamber /jain House In Front Of Coffee House Transport Nagar, Tehsil And District Korba C.G. 2 - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited , Bilaspur Territory Through Pradashik Prabandhak (Retail) Bilaspur, Old Housing Board Building, Kalpana Vihar, Nehru Nagar Bilaspur, Tehsil And District -Bilaspur C.G. 3 - Sub- Registrar, Korba , District -Korba Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Appellant For State/Resp. Nos.3 & 4 : : Mr. Sameer Oraon, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 31/07/2026 1. The appellant has preferred the present miscellaneous appeal under Section 43 (1) (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.08.01 10:57:25 +0530 2 short “CPC”), challenging the impugned order dated 06.02.2026 passed by the learned Second District Judge, Korba, District Korba (CG) in Civil Suit No.2A/2025, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1 herein under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC has been allowed. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. However, he prays that the trial Court be directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a stipulated period. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by counsel for the appellant. 4. On due consideration, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present appeal. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/submission of a copy of this order. 5. Both parties are also directed to cooperate with the trial Court for expeditious disposal of the case. 6. Accordingly, the present miscellaneous appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn, with the aforesaid direction. 7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar