Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 30285 (PNJ)

ALKESH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8408/2026 · 2026-07-16

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-8408-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CRWP-8408-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 ALKESH AND ANOTHER ...PETITIONERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. M.D. Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- CRM-W-974-2026 Allowed as prayed for. CRWP-8408-2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus to directing the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and take action on their representation dated 12.07.2026 (Annexure P-3). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.2. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent PRIYANKA 2026.07.17 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8408-2026 -2- representation dated 12.07.2026 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ashok Kumar Khubbar, Additional AG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel and without going into the question of legality of their relationship as well as without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Palwal to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 12.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 12.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 16.07.2026 pry 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PRIYANKA 2026.07.17 09:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document