RAM CHANDER AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/21057/2026 · 2026-07-14
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30276 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 30276 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
132
CWP-21057-2026
Date of Decision: 14.07.2026
Ram Chander and another
…Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Present:- Mr. G.S. Gopera, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana
Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Senior Advocate, (Senior Panel Counsel) with
Ms. Gurneet Sagoo, Panel Counsel for respondent no.2/UOI
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take action for fraud and embezzlement committed with respect to Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA) funds which were to be spent for development of village Samchana, Block Sampla, District Rohtak.
2.
It is apparent that the petitioners are espousing a public cause as they want action to be taken for the alleged embezzlement of public funds. Such issues can be raised by way of a public interest petition.
3.
The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to agitate their rights by filing a public interest petition in accordance with law, if so advised.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE 14.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
PAYAL 2026.07.16 09:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment