Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010168612025
2026:CGHC:33151
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 747 of 2025 Laxmi Narayan Chandrakar S/o Late Sewak Ram Chandrakar Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kodia, Post Pauwara, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus Abhijit Singh Collector, Office of The Collectorate, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) (Contemnor)
... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Tarun Dadsena, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J
Order on Board (31st July, 2026) This contempt petition arises out of the order dated 6.2.2025 passed by this Court in WPC No.230/2025 whereby this Court had
directed the Collector, Durg (respondent No.3 therein) to decide the representation filed by the petitioner after affording opportunity of hearing to respondent No.6 therein namely Rameshwar Chandrakar within a period of 50 days from the date receipt of copy of the order.
2
02. The respondent has filed his reply. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, referring to his reply and order dated 30.6.2025 (Annexure R/4) would submit that after providing due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and Rameshwar Chandrakar, the representation dated 10.12.2024 filed by the petitioner has been
disposed of.
03.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that without proper enquiry into the matter, the petitioner’s representation has been
disposed of by the Collector, Durg with a direction to the petitioner to file a civil suit before the competent civil court.
04. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
05. Having considered the reply filed by the respondent and the
order dated 30.6.2025 (Annexure R/4) passed by the respondent whereby representation filed by the petitioner has been decided, no case of contempt is made out as the order under contempt has been duly complied with by the respondent. Therefore, the contempt proceeding deserves to be dropped. Accordingly, the rule issued to the respondent is discharged and contempt proceeding is hereby dropped. Sd/ (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Khan MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Digitally signed by MOHD AKHTAR KHAN Date: 2026.07.31 15:53:18 +0530